Income Generating Strategies in Crypto: Real World Examples from Re7 Capital

What if you could earn 15-20% annual returns in crypto without taking any directional market risk? At Breakpoint 2025, Evgeny Gokhberg from Re7 Capital revealed how his firm has delivered consistent market-neutral returns for five years running—even surviving the catastrophic events of 2022 that wiped out many competitors.

Summary

Top Projects

Lulo

Score: 7,586.13

Bonk

Score: 4,806.12

Sphere

Score: 2,544.42

Moonwalk

Score: 2,026.11

Re7 Capital has pioneered a sophisticated approach to institutional crypto yield that strips away the volatility that keeps traditional investors on the sidelines. Running a market-neutral DeFi yield fund for approximately five years, the firm has deployed over a billion dollars into stablecoin yield strategies across virtually every blockchain and thousands of protocols.

Gokhberg explained that the fundamental difference between crypto yield and traditional investing lies in the source of risk. While traditional finance exposes investors to credit default and market risk, DeFi yield strategies primarily expose investors to software risk—specifically, smart contract vulnerabilities. This distinction is crucial because it means crypto yields can actually serve as a diversifier for traditional portfolios, since the risks are largely uncorrelated with traditional market downturns.

The presentation highlighted that Solana offers unique characteristics for yield generation. While the chain has historically provided higher staking yields than Ethereum (often around 8%), stablecoin yields across chains are remarkably consistent. Gokhberg argued that Solana's less open-source architecture could paradoxically make it more secure in certain contexts, though investors must account for the chain's occasional halts and transaction congestion when designing their strategies.

Perhaps most importantly, Gokhberg revealed why his fund avoided catastrophic losses during the 2022 crypto collapse: they never deployed a single dollar to Terra's Anchor protocol because it failed their due diligence process. This disciplined approach to risk management—treating DeFi investing like credit portfolio management—has become the firm's competitive advantage.

Key Points:

Understanding Crypto Yield Sources

Crypto yield comes from multiple sources that differ fundamentally in their risk profiles. Staking yields derive from underwriting blockchain security, while lending yields come from providing capital to borrowers. Market making and trading operations offer additional yield opportunities through capturing spreads and managing inventory.

On Solana specifically, yields can be generated through native staking, lending protocols like Kamino, and trading venues like JLP. When combined into a diversified portfolio, these various yield sources create risk diversification because each type of yield comes with different underlying risks. Importantly, staking yields are inflation-driven and vary by chain economics, while stablecoin yields tend to be consistent across all major blockchains.

The Institutional Barrier: Risk Perception vs. Reality

The biggest obstacle preventing institutional adoption isn't technical—it's educational. Gokhberg noted that institutional decision-makers optimize around career risk: "Best case scenario, you get a small bonus, worst case scenario, you get fired." This creates a natural conservatism that prevents exploration of new yield sources.

When institutions express concern about "crypto risk," they typically conflate several distinct risks: Bitcoin price movements, exchange failures like FTX, and protocol hacks. Gokhberg's approach has been to educate investors that DeFi yield strategies represent an entirely new category—software risk—that has no equivalent in traditional finance. No other investment strategy in the world pays investors to take software risk, making this a genuinely novel asset class requiring new frameworks for evaluation.

Smart Contract Risk Assessment Framework

Re7 Capital has built a proprietary risk assessment framework that treats smart contract evaluation similarly to credit analysis. Each protocol is analyzed across approximately 50 different touchpoints and assigned a rating from "triple A" to "triple C." This allows the construction of a diversified portfolio designed to survive any single protocol failure.

The framework acknowledges three layers of existential risk in any DeFi deployment: asset risk (whether stablecoin or native token), platform risk (the specific protocol), and chain risk (the underlying blockchain). The 2,000 new DeFi platforms that launched in the past year far outpace the number of professional yield managers capable of evaluating them—Gokhberg estimated perhaps five funds globally can deploy capital at scale with proper due diligence.

Solana's Unique Risk-Reward Profile

Solana presents a distinct investment thesis compared to EVM-compatible chains. The network was designed for velocity and speculation rather than slow-moving capital preservation. This philosophy affects how yield strategies must be structured—investors must account for potential network congestion and historical halts when designing their exit strategies.

However, Gokhberg suggested that Solana's architecture may offer certain security advantages precisely because it's less open-source than alternatives. The rapid unlock period (24-48 hours versus Ethereum's longer timeframe) also provides operational advantages. Stablecoin yields on Solana remain competitive with other chains, making it an attractive destination for institutional capital seeking yield without directional exposure.

The Future of Staking ETFs and Yield Products

As regulation clarifies and staking ETFs become reality, Gokhberg predicts a "race to the bottom" on fees similar to what occurred with traditional index funds. ETF providers will pursue staking yield not because investors demand it, but because it allows them to increase management fees from roughly 10 basis points to 30 basis points.

However, Gokhberg cautioned that yield should not be the primary consideration for long-term holders. When Solana drops 6% in a single morning due to Federal Reserve announcements, an entire year of staking yield evaporates. For investors seeking genuine yield without volatility, market-neutral strategies that target 15-20% annual returns offer a more appropriate vehicle than staked directional positions.

Facts + Figures

• Re7 Capital has been running its market-neutral DeFi yield fund for approximately five years
• The firm has deployed over $1 billion into stablecoin yield strategies
• Deployments span across virtually every blockchain and thousands of protocols
• Approximately 2,000 new DeFi platforms launched in the past year
• Gokhberg estimates only about five funds globally can deploy capital at scale with proper due diligence
• The risk assessment framework evaluates protocols across roughly 50 different touchpoints
• Market-neutral strategies target 15-20% annual returns
• Solana gross staking yields typically hover around 8%
• Solana unlock periods are 24-48 hours
• Re7 Capital never deployed any capital to Terra's Anchor protocol, avoiding those losses
• The firm did have exposure to FTX but kept it small enough that the loss didn't materially impact the portfolio

Top Quotes

"The problem with crypto is everything means nothing and it means everything at the same time."

"There is no other investment strategy in the world that pays you yield in exchange for taking software risk."

"The function of DeFi liquidity providers as a whole is making sure that the spreads are tight, making sure that when someone wants to borrow on Kamino or Aave, the cost of that is acceptable."

"We want to go to sleep and know that no matter what blows up in the world, we want to wake up to a portfolio that's up for the year."

"Things like Terra have never passed our DD process. We just blacklisted it. We've never put a single cent into Anchor."

"If there is a business that can be commoditized to zero over time, it will happen."

"Today, Solana is down 6% because people don't like what the Fed did. That's your year of yield gone in one morning."

"Risk doesn't always correlate with the return. Quite often you have very low yielding platforms which are basically untouchable from a risk perspective and something else that is much safer gives you higher yield."

Questions Answered

What is market-neutral DeFi yield and how does it work?

Market-neutral DeFi yield strategies deliver consistent returns regardless of whether crypto prices go up or down. Instead of betting on price direction, these strategies extract value from providing liquidity, lending, and other services that the DeFi ecosystem needs to function. Re7 Capital has delivered approximately 15-20% annual returns through this approach, making money by essentially performing the role that banks play in traditional finance—channeling liquidity into the economy to keep commerce moving. The key is diversification across multiple yield sources so that no single failure can devastate the portfolio.

Why should traditional institutions consider crypto yield strategies?

Traditional institutions should consider crypto yield because it offers returns that are difficult or impossible to achieve in traditional finance while exposing them to risks that are largely uncorrelated with their existing portfolios. When traditional markets decline due to economic downturns or credit events, DeFi protocols don't necessarily fail—they fail when software is hacked. This makes crypto yield an effective diversifier. Additionally, with a proper risk management framework that treats smart contract evaluation like credit analysis, institutions can achieve risk-adjusted returns that compare favorably to traditional fixed income.

How can investors protect themselves from protocol failures like Terra/Luna?

Protection comes through rigorous due diligence and position sizing. Re7 Capital never invested in Terra's Anchor protocol because it failed their internal evaluation across their 50-point risk assessment framework. When protocols do fail unexpectedly, proper position sizing ensures no single loss is catastrophic. The firm had exposure to FTX, but the position was small enough that the loss didn't materially impact overall returns. The philosophy is to construct portfolios where any single failure can be absorbed while the remaining positions continue generating positive returns.

How does Solana compare to other chains for yield generation?

Solana offers higher native staking yields than most chains (approximately 8% gross) due to its inflation schedule, though this isn't inherently linked to higher risk—it's simply how the economic model was designed. For stablecoin yields, Solana performs on par with other chains. However, Solana's design philosophy prioritizes velocity and speculation over capital preservation, which affects how strategies must be structured. Investors must account for potential network congestion and plan for scenarios where urgent transactions might not process immediately. The faster unlock period (24-48 hours) is an advantage over Ethereum.

Will staking ETF yields decline as adoption increases?

Yes, yields are likely to decline over time as more capital enters the market. The fundamental question is why Solana needs to pay 8% to maintain security when that number could theoretically be much lower. As ETF products proliferate and competition intensifies, fees will face downward pressure similar to what happened with traditional index funds. However, ETF providers will still pursue staking yields because even modest returns allow them to justify higher management fees—increasing from around 10 basis points to 30 basis points. For institutions seeking yield without volatility, market-neutral strategies may remain more attractive than directional staked positions.