DATs: Why DATs Will Succeed — and Why They Won't

Over 80 Digital Asset Treasuries now exist with more than $30 billion in combined market cap, and Pantera Capital's Cosmo Jiang—the investor who helped ignite this entire trend—is revealing which will survive and which will fail.

Summary

Top Projects

Lulo

Score: 7,586.13

Bonk

Score: 4,806.12

Sphere

Score: 2,544.42

Moonwalk

Score: 2,026.11

In a masterclass session at Breakpoint 2025, Cosmo Jiang, General Partner and Portfolio Manager at Pantera Capital, provided unprecedented insight into the Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) landscape that has exploded across capital markets this year. Jiang's firm anchored two of the most significant DATs: SOL Strategies (the first U.S.-based Solana treasury company) and 21 Capital (backed by Tether and SoftBank), positioning Pantera at the epicenter of this financial revolution.

The DAT model represents a fundamental shift in how public companies can maximize shareholder value by accumulating digital assets rather than traditional currency reserves. Jiang compared these structures to traditional financial services companies like banks and insurance firms, but denominated in cryptocurrency instead of dollars. This framework has attracted massive institutional attention, with some of the world's largest funds—including Capital Group (America's largest mutual fund) and Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund—now holding positions in these vehicles.

However, Jiang issued a stark warning: the easy days are over. What he calls the "genesis phase" of DATs has concluded, leaving entrepreneurs to compete in what will now become a brutal consolidation period. Not every DAT will survive, just as not every active manager beats passive ETFs. The separation of winners from losers is beginning, and only one or two leaders per asset class will likely emerge from the carnage.

Key Points:

The DAT Business Model Explained

Digital Asset Treasuries operate as public companies whose primary goal is maximizing shareholder value through maximizing token accumulation per share. Unlike passive ETFs that maintain a static one-to-one relationship with the underlying asset, DATs function as active managers with multiple strategies to grow holdings.

Jiang explained that these businesses generate yield through two primary mechanisms. On the liability side, companies can raise equity accretively when trading above book value, issue debt, sell warrants to monetize volatility, or offer preferred shares to capitalize on future value creation. On the asset side, particularly for Solana-based DATs, strategies include staking (SOL Strategies is now one of the largest Solana stakers), deploying capital into DeFi protocols, and lending arrangements. This combination of financial engineering and yield generation creates multiple paths to outperform simple buy-and-hold strategies.

Why Solana DATs Have a Unique Advantage

Jiang made clear that Pantera's decision to back a Solana-focused treasury wasn't arbitrary—they believe Solana represents the "most exciting L1 with the highest risk-adjusted upside." This conviction drives their strategy beyond mere accumulation to active ecosystem development.

The Solana DAT model benefits from native staking yields not available to Bitcoin treasuries, along with access to Solana's robust DeFi ecosystem for additional yield generation. Jiang also emphasized that these companies serve as de facto investor relations functions for the Solana ecosystem, bringing the investment thesis to mainstream audiences who would never attend a crypto conference but actively trade equities.

Red Flags: What Separates Winners from Losers

Jiang outlined critical evaluation criteria for investors considering DAT exposure. Management incentive alignment tops the list—investors should verify that leadership teams are measured on token accumulation per share and have significant personal stakes in the outcome. Pantera maintains the largest shareholder position in SOL Strategies, ensuring their interests align with other investors.

Experience matters enormously in this space. Jiang noted that many crypto natives lack familiarity with traditional capital markets tools that are second nature to traditional finance professionals. Understanding how to engage investment bankers, work with sell-side analysts, and communicate with institutional investors requires specific expertise that many DAT management teams lack.

Perhaps most critically, Jiang warned against DATs that primarily market to crypto natives. The entire purpose of these vehicles is accessing new capital pools—traditional retail investors and long-only institutions—not recycling capital already in the crypto ecosystem.

The Consolidation Phase Has Begun

The DAT landscape has evolved from its genesis phase into what Jiang calls the "consolidation execution phase." Every obvious opportunity has been filled, with over 80 DATs now competing across various digital assets. The white space Jiang once mapped on a whiteboard has been completely claimed.

This means barriers to entry have increased dramatically for new entrants, while existing players must now demonstrate operational excellence to survive. Jiang predicts significant consolidation through acquisitions and partnerships, with capital concentrating into one or two leaders per asset class. This consolidation is healthy for the ecosystem, as it channels resources toward companies capable of driving meaningful growth for their underlying assets.

ETFs vs. DATs: The Active Management Debate

When asked about competition with spot crypto ETFs, Jiang drew a clear distinction: ETFs are passive exposure while DATs represent active management. This fundamental difference means different outcomes for different investors.

Passive ETF investors know exactly what they're getting—one unit of exposure per dollar invested, minus small fees. DAT investors are betting on management teams to outperform through strategic capital deployment. Just as most active equity managers fail to beat their benchmarks, Jiang expects most DATs will underperform simple ETF exposure. However, high-performing DATs with skilled management teams "absolutely have a right to win and can win."

Facts + Figures

• Over 80 Digital Asset Treasuries are now live globally
• More than $20 billion in capital has been raised by DATs
• Combined market cap exceeds $30 billion (excluding MicroStrategy)
• Capital Group, America's largest mutual fund, is a top 10 holder of MicroStrategy
• Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund is a top 10 holder of MicroStrategy
• SOL Strategies is one of the largest stakers of Solana in the ecosystem
• Pantera Capital anchored both SOL Strategies (first U.S. Solana DAT) and 21 Capital (Tether/SoftBank Bitcoin treasury)
• DATs need to reach "a few billion market cap" to become relevant for large long-only institutions
• Pantera is the largest shareholder in SOL Strategies
• The DAT genesis phase began approximately in March 2025

Top Quotes

"If Solana doesn't have value, or if we don't believe Solana's value, then this whole thing doesn't make sense."

"The whole point of a DAT is not to market to crypto natives. The whole point of a DAT is to deliver the story to a new set of investors."

"Not every DAT is going to beat the ETF. That would be par for the course for capitalism."

"These business models have always existed. They just used to be called financial services companies."

"We strongly believe that Solana is the most exciting L1 with the highest risk-adjusted upside."

"High-performing DATs, high-performing active managers absolutely have a right to win and can win."

"The obvious white space is gone. And now the barriers to entry are much higher."

"Always be long-term greedy. You shouldn't be optimizing for short-term gains."

"We're going to see the separation of winners and losers. All that is healthy."

"Sometimes I feel that with some baited breath, because obviously it caused some losses for some people as well."

Questions Answered

What exactly is a Digital Asset Treasury (DAT)?

A DAT is a publicly traded company whose primary objective is maximizing shareholder value by accumulating cryptocurrency rather than traditional currency reserves. Think of it as a financial services company—similar to a bank or insurance company—but one that measures its book value in digital assets like Bitcoin or Solana instead of dollars. The key metric for success is growing the number of tokens held per share outstanding, which can be achieved through both financial engineering on the liability side and yield generation on the asset side of the balance sheet.

How do DATs generate returns for shareholders?

DATs employ multiple strategies across their balance sheets. On the liability side, they can raise equity when trading above book value, issue debt, sell warrants to monetize stock volatility, or offer preferred shares. On the asset side, Solana-focused DATs can stake their holdings to earn native rewards, deploy capital into DeFi protocols for additional yield, or engage in lending activities. The combination of these strategies, when executed well, can result in more tokens per share over time than simply buying and holding the underlying asset.

Should I invest in a crypto ETF or a DAT?

This depends on your investment philosophy regarding active versus passive management. ETFs provide straightforward, passive exposure—you get exactly one unit of the underlying asset per dollar invested, minus small fees. DATs offer active management where skilled teams attempt to grow holdings through strategic operations. Jiang explicitly states that most DATs will likely underperform ETFs, just as most active equity managers fail to beat their benchmarks. However, top-performing DATs with experienced management and aligned incentives can potentially deliver superior returns.

What should investors look for when evaluating a DAT?

Key factors include management incentive alignment, where leaders should have significant personal stakes and be measured on token accumulation per share. Experience matters—look for teams with traditional finance backgrounds who understand capital markets operations, banker relationships, and institutional communication. Critically, evaluate whether the DAT is marketing to new investor audiences rather than recycling existing crypto capital. Strong DATs should function as the investor relations arm for their underlying asset, bringing the investment thesis to mainstream equity investors.

Why did Pantera choose Solana for its first DAT investment?

Pantera believes Solana represents the most exciting Layer 1 blockchain with the highest risk-adjusted upside potential. Beyond fundamental conviction, Solana-based DATs enjoy structural advantages including native staking yields and access to a robust DeFi ecosystem for yield generation—opportunities not available to Bitcoin treasury companies. The firm views SOL Strategies as serving a dual purpose: maximizing returns for shareholders while simultaneously expanding awareness of Solana among traditional investors who would otherwise never encounter the ecosystem.

What happens to DATs that don't succeed?

The DAT market is entering a consolidation phase where winners and losers will separate. Companies that fail to execute on capital markets strategies, lack experienced management, or cannot reach sufficient scale will likely be acquired by stronger competitors or simply fade away. Jiang predicts that only one or two leaders will emerge per asset class, with capital concentrating into these winners. This consolidation is ultimately healthy for the ecosystem as it channels resources toward companies capable of driving meaningful growth.

How large does a DAT need to be to attract institutional investment?

Jiang indicated that DATs need to reach "a few billion market cap" to become relevant for large long-only institutions. At smaller scales, these vehicles don't move the needle for funds managing hundreds of billions of dollars. However, building relationships and educating institutional investors early is critical—when DATs reach appropriate scale, these investors "actually do allocate in size." The current top 10 holders of MicroStrategy include giants like Capital Group and Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund, demonstrating institutional appetite for scaled DAT exposure.